1
In the future the question will not be
‘Are people credit-worthy’, but rather,
‘Are banks people-worthy?’
Muhammad Yunus
1. INTRODUCTION
1
Microfinance and microcredit are concepts frequently mentioned in
recent talks about financial inclusion, economic and human
development. Their relevance is particularly significant in correlation with
socially useful goals, such as alleviating poverty and stimulating local
entrepreneurship within a country, especially in the developing and poor
ones. Although these concepts are often used interchangeably, they do
not mean exactly the same thing. Indeed, microfinance can be
considered an economic branch of the financial contracts and includes
different components, such as: microcredit, microsavings,
microinsurance and functioning of dedicated institutions. On the other
hand, the broad definition of microcredit is the collection of lending and
saving methods alternative to traditional forms of credit.
Nowadays, microcredit is often associated with Mohammed Yunus,
Nobel Prize for Peace in 2006. Since seventies of last century, he
proposed a financial instrument of credit access for poor communities,
1
Niccoli, A., Presbitero, A., F., Microcredito e Macrosperanze, 2010, pp. 1-6.
2
by creating economic and social development from below. However,
the first experiences in such direction can be traced back to the fifteenth
century in Europe with charities and private initiatives.
Microcredit is actually growing in importance in many developed
countries as well as in Italy. In the European context, the communitarian
political will is definitively playing an important role across member States
to sustain the small-medium enterprises (which represent about the 80%
of firms in Italy) through different ways, such as supporting the creation of
start-ups, promoting growth policies and making available the liquidity
that they usually lack because of the credit rationing
2
.
These and other aspects of the cultural and historical background are
analyzed in the following chapter.
In the third chapter, the recent development of microcredit in Italy is
explored, starting from the structural factors of the Italian economy,
passing through the historical evolution of the lending system, and
finishing with the recent regulation designed for microcredit.
The final chapter proposes a transnational comparison between two
MFIs: The Italian PerMicro and the French ADIE. Before the comparison, it
is provided a description of both MFIs and it is mentioned the French
regulation about/upon microcredit, the oldest in Europe.
The methodology used to write this thesis is a personal elaboration and a
synthesis of the information searched on the institutional and
noninstitutional websites and free-access documentations (on-line and
libraries).
2
The reasons behind it may be multiple, such as inflation, monetary devaluations and so on.
However, the most important reason in recent years is the economic downturn caused by the
financial crisis of 2007-2008 and followed soon after by the sovereign debt crisis in Europe.
3
2. HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF MICROFINANCE
2.1 Scope of the financial system
The modern economic system is based on a relatively free circulation of
money (capital) and resources (from consumption goods to production
inputs) across countries, in order to allow both individuals and businesses
to satisfy their current needs or invest in profitable projects. However, the
scarcity of many resources makes it difficult to achieve a fair distribution
of them among the population, causing an intrinsic higher value in
relation to both their local and global demand.
In the specific case of financial markets, the higher value of money is
usually recognized through the provision of a premium or interest to
those who make its funds available. Thus, money – which is the
circulating medium of exchange for the other resources and for itself –
may be difficult to access in the measure it is needed by everyone
(Ingham, 2003). This difficulty may depend both on individual conditions
(e.g. none or low salary, no valuable inheritance from parents) and to
collective reasons (e.g. small monetary base of the country,
devaluations of currency, inefficient financial markets, and so on).
Many experts and surveys of national and international institutions agree
that the actual differences in financial endowments among countries
are mainly determined by three factors: size of each economy, per
capita income levels, and the capability of attracting foreign direct
investments (FDI). Therefore, the economy of a country depends on its
financial endowments, which, in turn depend on how rich the country
already is, how comparatively rich are the people living in that country,
to competitive factors and comparative advantages, that are essential
for attracting investors in an industry (Visco, 2015).
4
Therefore, the financial system cannot solve problems of real nature,
such as low competitiveness and insufficient productivity levels, but it has
an indirect role in facilitating the processes of transformation, growth of
the productive system. It is up to businesses and their management skills
the responsibility to achieve a more balanced financial structure
(Panetta, 2015).
In this context, a fundamental role is played by the policy maker since he
can create the environmental conditions for a better circulation of the
resources, or simply avoid any potentially harmful thinning of them. The
most important interventions are the regulation of the national financial
system (e.g. framework of financial providers, financial consumer
protection, and so on) and its integration at global level (harmonization).
Financial education, information and awareness campaigns are
becoming important, too (Lewis and Messy, 2012).
Furthermore, in order to enhance the economic development within a
country, a policy maker needs to provide some basic services. The
simplest vision of the World Economy is that developed countries stand in
a better position since their long-run economic development – or a
better capital accumulation – has been accompanied by strong
developments in their infrastructures, financial system and human
capital. This vision does not really explain the differences of income
among rich and poor countries, because it does not consider some
aspects of the historical competition among countries, the different
factor endowments and their different cultures (Ray, 1998).
However, reversing the causality of the first statement in this paragraph, it
enlightens the reasons for country backwardness, which are inadequate
infrastructures, a weak financial system and a poor human capital.
Therefore, the financial system may be seen as the regulated
aggregation of financial institutions, ranging from local private operators
5
to international public institutions that guarantee a constant provision of
monetary flows, or securities, and other financial services to individuals
and firms around the world. The grouping of similar securities and other
related services gives origin to a specific financial market, a place
(usually virtual) in which different typologies of institutions can interact to
allocate surplus money where is needed. In particular, there is a large
variety of financial providers operating at different levels and differing in
their organizational structure and governance, in the types of products
and services offered, in the legal form and in the authority’s supervision.
The last important factor is the financial supervision. Supervision is
needed to monitor behavior of agents and to enforce the rules.
Supervision can be grouped into three broad categories
3
:
• microprudential supervision: surveillance of the safety and
soundness of individual institutions;
• macroprudential supervision: monitoring the exposure to systemic
risk, identifying potential threats to stability arising from
macroeconomic or financial market developments, and from
market infrastructures;
• customer protection (nonprudential): monitoring business conduct
and the disclosure of information to customers and other
stakeholders.
In general, it is possible to distinguish between prudential regulation,
which involves the monitoring of the financial soundness of related
businesses and the countermeasures when problems arise, and
nonprudential regulation, which is a sort of code of conduct for
businesses. There is wide recognition that compliances and
enforcements with prudential regulation are usually more complex,
3
Rossi, S., Towards a European Banking Union: a euro-area central bank supervisor as a first step,
2015, p. 5.
6
difficult, and expensive than nonprudential regulation, for both the
regulator and the regulated institution (CGAP, 2012).
“Designing the optimal model of a regulatory and supervisory
architecture is a daunting task. The empirical evidence does not prove
the dominance of any particular model over the others, although several
studies have pointed out that weaknesses in regulation and supervision
might be factors leading to a financial crisis”
4
.
2.2 Determinants for financial exclusion and inclusion
On the basis of the temporary opportunities of investment, and in
response to the need of money for individual consumption, the most
important financial market is Credit, defined as the trust relationship
which allows one creditor part, also known as lender, to provide money
or other resources to another debtor part, also known as borrower, in
exchange of a higher quantity of money or other resources at a later
date. The interest (premium) is usually established in advance.
Although credit is associated with deferred payments, it cannot act as a
unit of account for itself like money. In the end, it does not necessarily
require money. Indeed, the credit concept can be applied in barter
economies as well, based on the direct exchange of goods and
services
5
.
A related concept is that of financial inclusion, which, according to the
CGAP
6
, generally refers to the state in which all working age adults have
effective access to credit, savings, payments and insurance from formal
service providers. In many developing countries and transitional
4
Cihák, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Martinez Peria, M. S., and Mohseni-Cheraghlou, A., Bank
regulation and supervision in the context of the global crisis, 2013, pp. 733-746; reference from
Rossi (2015).
5
Ingham, G., The Nature of Money, 2004, pp. 12–19.
6
CGAP, A Guide to Regulation and Supervision of Microfinance. Consensus Guidelines, 2012, p. 1
plus note 3.