4
INTRODUCTION
External growth is a way of development effected for a long time by the
firms in the capitalistic advances economies. In fact, the operations of
mergers and acquisitions, with which the control of a firm is acquired by
another firm to give life to a single resultant entity or to a group of firms,
has modified the industrial structure of some countries from the end of last
century.
Consequently, the economic literature has studied the causes and the effects
of these operations. Analysis concerns new models, and the greatest
availability of data allows new empirical evidence to explain this diffused
and complex phenomenon.
The present work has the goal to describe, under the qualitative and
quantitative profile, the advantages of the synergies and of the control value
acquired through the operations of mergers and acquisitions.
The first chapter provides the introductory concepts of the phenomenon of
acquisitions and their evaluation, the principal phases in acquisition
valuation and the benefits produced by these operations.
The second chapter introduces an examination on the equity and firm
valuation, and therefore, the fundamental methods to proceed to a coherent
valuation of the synergies advantages and of the control value in the
acquisitions.
5
Introduction
Once analyzed the presuppositions, the third chapter enters in the heart of
this work with the individualization, the classification and the evaluation of
the synergies, which arouse particular interest in the transfer of business unit
or business complexes. "The synergies between two or more systems, allow
to produce combined effects superior to the simple sum of the effects that
derive from independent operating of systems (stand alone)”1.
The fourth chapter, logically connected to the preceding chapter, presents
the effects of the control value following from the changing management,
element that allows the passage from the economic capital to the strategic
capital. The attention is paid to the determining factors of the changing
control and the most important empirical evidence with the goal to have an
idea of what it happens in the reality.
Strong companies usually buy other companies to create a more
competitive, cost-efficient company. The companies will come together
hoping to gain a greater market share or to achieve greater efficiency.
Because of these potential benefits, target companies will often agree to be
purchased when they know they cannot survive alone.
Valuing a firm for a takeover is not an easy task. In addition to all the
complexities associated with standards valuation, there are other road-blocks
that have to be negotiated before arriving at a final answer.
1M. TALIENTO, La stima del valore delle "sinergie" nelle acquisizioni di aziende in esercizio. Note
metodologiche e rilievi economico contabili, RIREA, n.23, Roma, 2004, p. 6.
6
CHAPTER 1
ACQUISITION VALUATION
SUMMARY: 1.1. Evaluation: introductory concepts. – 1.1.1. Italian and Anglo–Saxon evaluation. – 1.2.
Acquisitions as a key for value creation. – 1.3. The value created from an acquisition. – 1.3.1. Premise. –
1.3.2. The Differential Analysis. – 1.3.3. Potential benefits. – 1.4. Phases in acquisition valuation. – 1.5.
The benefits produced by acquisitions.
1.1. EVALUATION: INTRODUCTORY CONCEPTS
The evaluation of firms is a central theme in the economic-business
disciplines. The measurement of the value of the enterprises is a problem
known ever since the capitalistic enterprise exists but only in the last years it
has acquired a considerable importance.
The knowledge of the value of an activity is the premise to take correct
decisions such as: the definition of the price of purchase or transfer in a
takeover, the choice of an investment for a portfolio or the restructuring of
an enterprise.
In different contexts the respect of a rational and reliable value is important
to give an equilibrium to the satisfaction of the business affairs; the
operational moments can be described as follows:
the planning of "extraordinary" operations2, such as mergers,
divisions, transformations, a partner's exit, contributions of capital,
choice of the price of placement for the quotation in the Stock
Exchange, determination of the ratios of conversion for issues of
2See G. ZANDA, M. LACCHINI, T. ONESTI, La valutazione delle aziende, Giappichelli, Torino, 2005.
7
bonds and warrants, increases of capital in nature or with
renouncement to rights of option, increases of capital with surcharge
and so many others. It deals with particular operations which claim
the check of a value in a certain moment in order to protect in general
all the stakeholders and the financial markets;
the preparation of the budget, with the adoption on the corporation
behalf of the new international bookkeeping principles (Ias / Ifrs) in
the editing of the budgets;
the respect of the periodic economic enterprise performance, and,
in this context, the respect of the value is significant especially in the
activity of strategic planning.
In theory a valuation process is founded on three "pillars":
absolute evaluations – substantially income method, financial
method and mixed approach - which express a measure founded upon
various principles, criteria and methods; from the operative point of
view, such absolute judgment on the value can produce both
“economic” and “potential” values of the capital, according to the
degree of aggressiveness of the assumptions to the base of the
effected forecasts;
relative evaluations, which are criteria of evaluation that, through the
multiples of comparable firms, utilize the evaluations conducted by
the market;
informative base and fundamental analysis, where the informative
base is necessary so that to translate, through the fundamental
analysis, the models, the formulas and the multipliers in tools capable
to capture the levers of the value (value drivers), so that it gets to a
measure of a reliable value. These two components, always present in
8
any valuation process, have both a direct function and a role of
support to the other two pillars (absolute and relative criteria).
1.1.1. Italian and Anglo-Saxon approaches to evaluation
In particular, it is useful to observe the models used both in the Italian
economic-business culture and in the Anglo-Saxon one.
The Italian analysts use a vast range of models3, which can be classified
into:
direct methodologies, which are directly, to determine the value of
the firm, based on the price of market of the valuing firm or of
similar firms;
indirect methodologies, which are based on the revaluation of certain
quantities such as the business stock-elements, incomes, financial
flows or dividends.
a) The direct methods (based on the empirical multipliers) are
distinguished into criteria based on the equity approach to
valuation, that conduct to the estimation of the economic value
of the capital directly and immediately, and on the entity
approach to valuation, that lead to the estimation of the
economic value of the capital indirectly and mediately, by
means of the difference between the firm value (economic
value of the activity) and the market value of the financial
debts.
b) The indirect methods can have as a base of reference internal
business variables, which are:
- flow, dynamic variables;
3See G. ZANDA, M. LACCHINI, T. ONESTI, La valutazione delle aziende, Giappichelli, Torino, 2005, p.
23-30-53-62-154-155.
9
- stock , static elements;
- mixture, partly dynamic and partly static ones.
The criteria of valuation founded on the flows give birth to two
groups of methodologies: fundamental theoretical methods of
evaluation, which are the income method, the financial method
and the method of the dividends; fundamental simplified
methods of evaluation, which are the financial simple method
and the income simple method, very often used in substitution
of the theoretical methods for facility of application.
The methods of evaluation founded upon stock me estimates
are usually defined “net assets” methods of evaluation based on
the principles of analytical evaluation of each assets and
liabilities elements which compose the capital; they are
distinguished in pure or simple method and complex method.
Finally, the methodologies of evaluation based on mixed
measures refer partly to the dynamic items and partly to the
static ones.
It is important to stress that for the choice of the methods of evaluation you
need to respect some requirement, which are the rationality, the neutrality
and the objectivity.
Even the Anglo-Saxons analysts use a variety of models, but they can
fundamentally be distinguished into three great approaches4 as follows:
“discounted cash-flow valuation”, which has its own roots in the
rule of the actual value, where the estimate of whichever element or
4See A. DAMODARAN, Damodaran on valuation, Security Analysis for Investment and Corporate
Finance, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York-Chichester-Brisbane-Toronto-Singapore, 1994, p. 10-15-16-
18.
10
system is represented by the net present value of the flows of cash that
you expect from it;
“relative valuation” or evaluation through multiples, in which the
value of the business derives from the price of comparable activities,
standardized on the base of a common variable such as the profits, the
flows of cash, the bookkeeping value or the turnover;
“contingent claim valuation”, according to which an activity that
introduces similar characteristics to an option is valued using a
financial model of definition of the price of the options.
1.2. ACQUISITIONS AS A KEY FOR VALUE CREATION
Acquisitions have an exceptional capability to transform and to contribute
to the “renewal” of enterprises, to conquer a competitive position on the
market and to get all the potential advantages of a combination of activities
and business abilities.
In the past5 there were waves of acquisitions in different periods, but in the
eighties they became all over the world a more and more diffused
phenomenon and the actual level of acquisitions introduces a various
composition and a more international nature in comparison to the preceding
periods.
In the nineties the phenomenon of the acquisitions appeared wider and
wider, fragmented and global: the great majority of the acquisitions in the
United States and in the United Kingdom, in continental Europe and in
5See P. C. HASPESLAGH, D. B. JEMISON, La gestione delle acquisizioni: successi e insuccessi nel
rinnovamento delle imprese, introduction to italian edition of Sandro Sandri, traslation of Giovanni Baldi,
ETAS books, Milan, 1992, p. 9-12.
11
Japan were of strategic and friendly nature, among enterprises and
managing groups.
The aims6 to be reached in the management of the acquisitions can be
varied.
It is necessary to assure that acquisitions support the general strategy
of renewal adopted by the companies; however, in order to succeed in
making decisions, related to the acquisitions, in line with strategy, it
seems a difficult assignment, despite the clarity of the management in
subject of current strategy or the ability of the enterprise to conduct an
orderly process of strategic planning. The opportunities of acquisition
can rise some doubts on the strategy or be perfectly coherent to it.
A second aim can be, before acquisition, the development of a
decisional process that allows to appraise what the correct
acquisitions are and gives, for each ones, a specific justification in
presence of limited information, needs of rapidity and secrecy.
A third aim can be identified in the management of a process of
integration in a following moment to the acquisition to create new
value: it is important to say that a value is created only after the
acquisition has been completed, when the transfer of the abilities
occurs and the members of both organizations collaborate to create
the attended benefits. This collaboration is founded upon the wish and
ability of the managers of both organizations to go together toward a
new strategic goal and avoid all the obstacles which do not permit the
economic integration, even of personal workforces.
6See P. C. HASPESLAGH, D. B. JEMISON, La gestione delle acquisizioni: successi e insuccessi nel
rinnovamento delle imprese, cit., p. 15.