III
PREFACE
This dissertation is a discussion about a collection of articles aimed
to give a general view of the materials concerning the veiling practice
available in the Internet and in the libraries. The main basis of this work
is a database of around sixty articles found in the Internet and around
ten essays found in the libraries. The paper material has been consulted
in order to have a wider knowledge of the issue and obtain more
information about the history, culture and society of the Muslim world.
My purpose is to try to understand the ideas and opinions about the
veiling phenomenon from different points of view.
By analysing the articles, I found out three main ways of thinking:
the first regards the ideas of Muslim people who live or experience the
veiling practice from the inside. These people can be muhajabi women
(women who wear the hijab), converted or not converted women who
study the Islamic religion, scholars and so on. They believe the veil to be
a protection for women rather than a symbol of oppression.
Furthermore, they think that through the scarf a Muslim woman can
elevate herself to a superior level and state her identity as a Muslim.
The main articles used in this section are: Mackenzie Carpenter,
“Muslim Women Say Veil is more about Expression than Oppression”,
Post- Gazette, 2001; Al- Muhajabah (nickname for “Woman who wears
the hijab”), “On Veiling…”, 2001; Sehmina Jaffer Chopra, “Liberation
by the Veil”, 1996; Patricia J. Catto, “The Veil and the Sacred Space.
IV
One woman’s Symbolic Glimpse”, The Bisbee Observer, 2003 and
Nakata Khaula, “Veil: the View from the Inside”, Impact Magazine,
1999 1.
The second way of thinking concerns the opinions of Western writers
journalists and reporters. From an outsider’s point of view, they see the
veil as the main tool of social and patriarchal oppression of Muslim
women. I have focused my attention on the Western media depiction of
the veil, and the commonplaces about the veiled woman.
In brief, these common beliefs can be summed up as follows:
• Muslim women are oppressed by men and society;
• they are not capable of making free choices;
• a terrorist could hide behind the veil;
• women must be liberated by the veil.
This latter way of thinking comprehends a small number of articles
which I voluntarily omitted in order not to lead my analysis astray.
Some of them, indeed, contain very strong oppositions to the veiling
practice and do not appear to offer sound scientific background on the
issue.
1
The articles are available from different Web sites:
www.postgazette.com; consulted on 10.07.2006;
www.muhajabah.com/onveiling.htm; consulted on 21.03.2006;
www.islam101.com/women/hijbene.html; consulted on 24.04.2006;
www.bisbeemarquee.com/www/0716/003_1.php; consulted on 20.03.2006
www.albalagh.net/women/hijab/shtml#veil#veil; consulted on 10.07.2006.
V
I personally think these oppositions come from a misjudgement of
some contemporary facts, such as the Taliban government in
Afghanistan; so I decided not to specifically mention them, but only to
give a general account of them 2.
The third way of thinking still deals with the opinions of Western
writers, but in this case their writings represent an attempt “to
understand and let people understand” the veil phenomenon in a more
complete way.
Their articles always collect interviews and testimonies of Muslim
women; they often describe the historical, religious and ethnographic
proofs of the ancient and contemporary values of the veil.
The authors taken into consideration are: Stanley Kurtz, “Veil of
Fears: Why They Veil, Why We Should Leave it Alone- Afghan women”,
National Review, 2002; Sondra Hale, “The West and Veiling”, lecture
presented at the UCLA Forum “On Veiling and the Media”, 1998;
Darnell Cole and Shafiqa Ahmadi, “Perspectives and Experiences of
Muslim Women Who Veil on College Campuses”, Journal of College
Student Development, Iowa State University, 2003; Michelle
Rosenberg, “Muslim Women Offer a Glimpse Behind the Veil”,
Independent, London, 2005 3.
2
See for instance Rose V. Lindgren “When Foreign Intervention is Justified- Women
under the Taliban”, Humanist, 2002; Elizabeth Drevillon “Kabul: Women in the
Shadows- Afghanistan”, Unesco Courier, 1998; “Muslim Women Arrested under Law
Aimed at KKK”, Jet, 1996.
VI
The main purpose of these writers is to approach the issue without
prejudice or preconceptions and without being ethnocentric; this kind of
approach gives the scholar the advantage of being objective and not
influenced by his/her own culture.
Amongst these writers of both American and European origin there
are non-Western writers, such as Arabs in general, Egyptians or
Iranians who helped me to have a different idea of the Muslim world
and to refute the biases and commonplaces about Islam.
The veil has been and still is a matter of study that generates a large
literature: many publications regarding the veil as a practice, as a
cultural phenomenon and as a tool of oppression have been written,
and each scholar or journalist has tried to give an explanation of what
the veil is, what its meaning is and why it is worn.
First, each author has an individual opinion of the matter: the veil
stands for oppression, the veil stands for liberation, the veil is a matter
of free and personal choice, a religious or rather a socio-cultural
expression. Secondly, we have to consider the history of the veil, its use
and value in different countries and contexts and the importance it has
at present. Thirdly, the veiling issue is often misunderstood; the huge
3
The articles are available from different Web sites:
www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282; consulted on 21.03.2006;
www.isop.ucla.edu/cnes/home/article.asp?parentid=14575; consulted on
09.07.2006;
www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3752; consulted on 22.04.2006;
http.//independent.gmnews.com; consulted on 11.07.2006.
VII
number of articles and essays which I found in the Internet does not
make the phenomenon more intelligible. On the contrary,
misinterpretations and ethnocentrisms distort the matter and provoke a
series of cultural prejudices regarding the veil which are difficult to
eradicate.
That is why it is very important to proceed in order, considering the
history of the veil and contemporary events regarding the politics of
veiling, the studies of the most influential scholars, the testimonies of
women who wear the veil, the opinions of Muslim men and women and
those of Western intellectuals.
Accordingly, this work is divided into three chapters.
The first, called What is the Veil?, deals with the historical and
religious information regarding the veiling practice, focusing on its
ancient origin and uses.
Chapter Two, Politics and Society, reports the past and
contemporary political and social situations of five different Muslim
countries (Turkey, Afghanistan, Iran, Egypt, Algeria) together with the
testimonies of Muslim men and women and studies of Muslim and non-
Muslim writers and scholars. The countries are quite far from each
other geographically and culturally and have to be considered as
“sample areas”, because the database of articles on which my work is
based mainly focuses on these mentioned above.
VIII
Chapter Three, The Veil Today, is particularly complex and divided
into five different sections.
The first two Prejudices Against the Veil and The Veil Affair, analyse
the delicate relationship between the veiling practice and Western
culture, focusing on past events, such as the colonization of Egypt by the
British power during the 19th and 20th centuries, and the “Veil Affair”
occurred in France from the early 1980s on.
The section called The Veil as a Tool of Resistance describes the veil
as an instrument for struggle during the Algerian Revolution in the early
1930s.
The last two sections The Fashion and the Veil and Beauty as a Form
of Resistance, describe two particular situations in which women find
their way of personal expression, through their external appearance.
Fashion, for instance gives Muslim women the possibility to match
together the traditional veil with modern clothes, so that they can wear
what they want and be respectful of their religion.
Especially in those countries where political struggles and strict dress
codes have contributed to segregate women, they take care of their
bodies and faces in the privacy of their house; they make up and dress
up, in order to feel beautiful and state their female identity against the
strict rules imposed on their habits and behaviour.
IX
This work does not want to be an exhaustive study of the veiling
issue. I simply wanted to compare the different articles available on the
Web, including the books and essays I have found in the libraries.
I think I better understood the reasons and features of this
phenomenon, even though I am not an expert of the matter and cannot
assert that my new opinion is just or the right one.
I really hope this work can help destroy the misconceptions about so
controversial an item of clothing. Prejudice and “ethnographic Western
centrism” are the main obstacles to a genuine reasoning about this
controversial issue.
I have tried as much as possible, to lead my analysis without
preconceptions. I do not know if my attempt was a successful one, but I
really hope this work could be a good premise to a further discussion on
one of the most problematic subjects of our contemporary time.
X
METHODOLOGY
This dissertation is the result of the analysis and the comparison of
around seventy articles about the veil and the veiling practice. They
contain information about recent and contemporary events, regarding
the veil, and also deal with interviews, studies and opinions written by
scholars, journalists and writers in general.
The articles were mainly found on a specific search engine for news,
magazines, and articles (findarticles.com). The key words of the
research were “Muslim women and veil” and they showed about 330
results.
From this great number of results, I selected my articles following
these main criteria:
• the article must be recent in time (from 1990s to 2006);
• it must give information about the politics of veiling;
• it must give information about the relationship between women
and the veiling practice.
The seventy articles were skimmed off, excluding those writings
which did not suit the three main criteria mentioned above. So the final
work is effectively based on about sixty articles, details of which can be
found in the final appendixes.
XI
Other Web sites were also consulted to have a wider and more
complete view on the matter (each of them is reported in the final
bibliography).
Furthermore, as far as the non-electronic material is concerned, I
consulted seven different books (each of them is reported in the
bibliography).
The first two 4, Women and Gender in Islam, by Leila Ahmed (1992)
and Veil: Modesty, Privacy and Resistance, by Fadwa El Guindi (1999),
are written by two important scholars of the veil. I referred to them for
historical and ethnographic information about the veil. I also consulted
the book edited by Bailey-Tawadros, Veil: Veiling, Representation and
Contemporary Art (2003), which represents a good source of images
and photographs on the veil and also contains three interesting essays
about the veiling practice.
In order to have a conscious view about history and religion in
Muslim, Arab and non-Arab countries I consulted Il mondo arabo, by
Alberto Ponsi (2005), and, particularly, read some excerpts of the
Koran, translated and commented in Italian by Hamza Roberto
Piccardo (1996).
Finally, for an historical and contemporary view about the Muslim
women’s world and their relationship with the veil, I consulted the
4
Leila Ahmed, Women and Gender in Islam, Historical Roots of a Modern Debate,
Yale University Press, New Haven & London, 1992;
Fadwa El Guindi, Veil: Modesty, Privacy and Resistance, Berg, Oxford and New
York, 1999.
XII
Letters during the Embassy to Constantinople, written by Lady Mary
Wortley Montagu in 1716-1718 5 and the book written by Ivana Trevisani
Il velo e lo specchio, 2006.
I decided to include ten photographs with their respective
commentary, to have a direct vision of the different and topical issues
examined in each chapter. For every picture I have written a specific
commentary which describes the image portrayed and explains its
meaning.
5
An unauthenticated edition of the Turkish Embassy Letters, supposed to have
been prepared by John Cleland, was published after Lady Mary’s death, in 1763. The
original edition of the Letters was printed by Lord Wharncliffe in 1837. For my
analysis I referred to the Letters During the Embassy to Constantinople, by Clare
Brant, Everyman’s Library, New York, 1992.