CHAPTER ONE
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
1.0 CONTEXT OF STUDY
The problem of poverty is a major concern for all governments and the
struggle to alleviate poverty is leaving no government indifferent. Poverty
and inequality are actually a world wide phenomenon which is spreading in
rich and underdeveloped countries in different ways and is destined to
worsen unless new approaches are developed and new scientific knowledge
about its causes are discovered (Townsend, 1993). According to the figures
in the World Bank development report (1993), nearly 50 percent of the
world poor leaves in South Asia and sub Saharan Africa (SSA) with SSA
accounting for a highly disproportionate number base upon a poverty level
of less than 32 US dollars per month.
In Cameroon, overall poverty deepened within the period 1984/1996 with
rural poverty remaining more widespread, deeper and more severe than
urban poverty (see Baye 2005a, Fambon et al, 2004). Despite the improve
macro economic situation, public education and health indicators have
remained poor and Cameroon is still perceived as a very corrupt country on
the basis of surveys undertaken in 1998 and 1999 by transparency
international.
The Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper PRSP, (2003) also confirms that,
nearly 4 out of every ten Cameroonians in 2001 were living with an annual
income below the poverty line of CFAF 232.547 (roughly equivalent to US
$1 per person, per day or FCFA 19000 a month). This represents the
1
MASTER’S THESIS PRESENTED BY:
TAMBI DANIEL M
University of Yaounde II
Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences
Yaounde - Cameroon
JUNE 2008
THEME:
INTER-TEMPORAL DECOMPOSITION OF POVERTY AND
INEQUALITY IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF LIVING STANDARDS
IN CAMEROON
i
estimated annual income necessary for an individual in Yaounde to buy a
‘minimal basket’ of essential food and non food items. In 2001, eight poor
people out of ten were living in the country-side and the incidence of
poverty there is more than double the incidence in the cities.
As observed by Baye and Amungwa (2002), the increasing level of poverty
in rural communities induced many young people to migrate to large towns
where they expected to find better conditions. They ended up in a net work
of relatives and friends who initially support them against the worst
hardships; eventually some succeed in making ends meet, while others are
exposed to unemployment or under-employment, crime and social-
behaviour, which posed insecurity problems to both the authority and other
city dwellers.
More generally, as argued by Baye and Fambon, (2002), the joint effects of
the economic crises and structural adjustment programmes (SAPs) forced
many Cameroonians to adopt coping devices such as moonlighting, seeking
for survival in the informal sector. Also, they engaged in occupational and
geographical mobility, changing regional patterns of activities and
productivities, and adopting ‘‘behavioural innovations’’ like corruption and
other malpractices for survival. These adaptations are thought to have
modified the pattern of welfare among households in the different regions
and sectors of activities.
According to Baye (2006b), the adverse International environment as
reflected in the overvaluation of the CFAF against the dollar and the sagging
world market prices of commodity exports in the late 1980s and early 1990s,
and its implications for government revenue, production, consumption and
2
relative prices, led to 50% of devaluation of the CFAF in January 1994.
Being a centre-piece of adjustment, the devaluation was intended to perform
two functions: (1) reduce expenditure on imports and (2) re-allocate
resources away from non-tradable commodities with a view to propping up
the global competitiveness of the economy subsequent to the 1994
devaluation of the CFAF, Cameroon achieved macro-economic stability. Yet,
rural incomes were slow to improve because much of the acreage under
coffee and Cocoa had been abandoned, in addition to the typically low short
run elasticities of supply of these commodities.
Also Baye et al (2001) analysis of demographic variables in 1996 revealed
that poverty rates differ according to household size, gender and age of
members. The incidence of poverty increases as household size increases
with poor household having an average of 3.9 persons, compared to non-
poor household job with an average of 2.1 persons. Women represented
about 51 percent of the total population and 52 percent of the poor. The
incidence of overall poverty among the female headed households was lower
(55%) than that of their male counterparts (70%).
More so, transparency international, (1998 and 1999) state that the index for
the cost of living rose by 60% within 1998 and 1999, however, nominal
wages remained unchanged. From December 1992 to December 1995, real
wages of senior civil servant fell by 75/80 %, and this had a deleterious
impact on civil servants motivation and fuelled corruption as well as poverty
and inequality.
3
Considering official data from World Bank (2001), CAS (1996), PRSP
(2003) and ECAM 1 and 11, the above issues led to the following ‘Great
problems’:
Cameroon suffers from very high transportation costs, in particular for
transiting through the port of Douala which is the key entry and exit point
for international trade (see, 1996 CAS report). About half the population fell
below the poverty line and 86% of the poor live in rural areas. It is clear that
poverty increased massively during the depression and with the drastic wage
cut in public services, pushed urban poverty to become a major problem.
While less than 1% of households in Yaounde and Douala fell below the
poverty line in 1983, 20% of households in Yaounde and 30% in Douala did
so in 1993.
The rural environs had no sizable investment in agriculture, research and
infrastructure (fewer feeder roads). The agricultural sector (forestry and
fisheries included) received only 5% of budgetary allocations in 1995/96 and
8% in 1999/2000, even the approved agricultural projects of 1999,
accounted for only 5% of international development authority (IDA)
commitment on active projects.
The deterioration of the purchasing power of civil servants and rising
unemployment caused urban poverty to increase considerably since 1992.
The problem was aggravated by the dilapidated state of urban infrastructure
resulting from the collapse of public investment in the last 15 years. Bank
lending was very small, HIV prevalence was estimated at 7% of the adult
population in 1998 and an experience in South Africa indicates that once
4
prevalence has reached such a level, HIV spread very rapidly and the
epidemic can reach catastrophic proportions within 5 years.
The World Bank (1993) observes that the above situations is caused by ills
such as corruption, poor governance, poor judicial system, the prevalence of
HIV/AIDS pandemic, arm conflicts, heavy debt burden, low investment,
mismanagement of human and material resources which tend to plague
African countries into poverty and inequality in general and Cameroon in
particular.
1.1 PROBLEM STATEMENT
Many authors have approached the study on poverty and inequality change
in the living standard of Cameroon. Among these, are pioneer authors such
as Araar (2003), Chameni (2006), Baye (2005), NIS (2002), Baye et al,
(2002), Fambon et al (2004), Njinkeu et al (1997) just to sight a few.
In this regard, the determinants of changes in poverty, channels of share
growth, intra and inter sector contributions to changes in welfare are among
the attention-grabbing aspects in distributive analysis in this period of
substantive policy changes.
It should be noted that despite all these studies, knowledge on how
inequality and poverty changes by socio-economic characteristics such as
employment status, occupation, sector of activities, zone of residence and
region of a country is vital for policy, but unfortunately, still under exploit in
Cameroon. The only studies that tackle some aspects of the dynamics of
monetary poverty are national institute of statistics, NIS (2002), Baye (2004,
2006) and Fambon et al (2004) as well as Araar (2006), Baye, (2007) for the
5
case of inequality. Very little is known about the exact contributions of intra
and inter sectoral components to changes in aggregate poverty and
inequality using the 1996 and 2001 household survey. Yet, such knowledge
is required for public policy, especially in an era when poverty eradication is
gaining prominence in the policy menu.
This work is therefore building on existing knowledge in the sense that it
performs exact decomposition of changes in aggregate measured poverty
and inequality into within and between sector components that hinge on the
Shapley Value, a solution concept that is well known in the theory of
cooperative games.
1.2 RESEARCH QUESTION
MAIN RESEARCH QUESTION
The main research question is, what is the marginal contribution of the
within and between sector decomposition of poverty and inequality in the
distribution of living standards in Cameroon.
SPECIFIC RESEARCH QUESTIONS.
I) How did poverty and inequality evolve between 1996 and 2001?
2) What is the relative importance of the Within and Between sector effects
to changes in aggregate poverty?
3) What is the relative Contributions of the Within and Between sector
effects to levels and changes in inequality?
4) What policy implications can be derive on the basis of our analysis?
6
1.3 OBJECTIVES
MAIN OBJECTIVES
The main objective of this study is to examine how poverty and inequality
have changed and to decompose these changes into mobility and sector-
specific effects in the distribution of living standards in Cameroon.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
I) To examine the evolution of poverty and inequality between 1996 and
2001.
2) To assess the relative importance of the Within and Between sector effects
to changes in aggregate poverty.
3) To evaluate the relative Contributions of the Within and Between sector
effects to levels and changes in inequality.
4) To derive policy implications on the basis of the analysis.
1.4 HYPOTHESIS
MAIN HYPOTHESIS.
Poverty and inequality can be explained more by the marginal contribution
of the Within group than the Between group components.
SPECIFIC HYPOTHESIS
The specific hypotheses of this study are;
1) Inter – temporarily, poverty and inequality trends may not necessarily
depict the same tendencies.
2) The Within sector effects are relatively more important in accounting for
changes in aggregate poverty than the Between sector effects.
3) The Within sector effects contribute relatively more to trends in inequality
compared to between sector effects.
7
1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The added value of this paper lies in its contribution to empirical literature
on poverty and inequality analysis. Unlike other studies, this work highlights
the particular impact of poverty and inequality through the uncovering of the
incidence, intensity and inequality of poverty in both the rural and urban
regions systematically.
Baye (2005), state that “to better inform public debate in the aftermath of or
during policy changes that affect living standards, it is necessary to measure
the evolution of poverty and its components”. Associated to this statement,
this paper has gone a long way to decompose poverty and inequality in view
of assessing the factors explaining these phenomena hence showing its
importance in terms of public policy and nation building.
This work is motivated by personal interest. That is to understand the
unfolding events of poverty and inequality in Cameroon and the global
world, also this work is motivated by the conclusion of Professor Carmen Li
(2000), who argued that “poverty can not be eliminated but alleviated and
that new methods of measurements should be developed in order to
understand really why people are poor”. Therefore, in terms of policy and
decision making, this decomposition frame work can be used to reassess
Cameroon poverty and sub-group inequality trends in this era of new
millennium goals which are very important for policy setting and
entitlements.
8
1.6 METHODOLOGY
In this study, we decompose poverty and inequality. Thus, following Baye
(2005), the methodology proposed here, performs exact decomposition of
changes in aggregate measure poverty into within and between sector
components that hinge on the Shapley value. This is a well known solution
concept in the theory of cooperative games. In these analyses income and its
associated components could be viewed by households, as important
channels by which inequality is transmitted. The application of the Shapley
value to population subgroups decomposition problem presents some
attractive features even though it is more questionable. On the other hand,
the Shapley decomposition satisfies a number of nice properties.
We measure inequality using members of the generalised Gini class of
indices (see Donaldson and Weymark, 1980, Yitzhaki, 1983). The
conventional Gini coefficient which is perhaps the most commonly used
inequality index is a member of this class and associated with other
members incorporate different ethical judgements.
The influence of population sub groups should not be left out such as those
defined by age, sex, or race (see Bourguignon, (1979), Cowel, (1980) and
Shorrocks, (1980, 1984 and 1999). It is legitimate to ask for the contribution
of each sub group to the overall inequality. In this case, we use an additive
decomposable property which requires that the overall inequality in a cross
section to be the sum of two terms: a weighted sum of within group
inequalities and a between group term computed as if each person within a
given group received the group mean income.
We use data from two Cameroonian Household surveys (ECAM 1 and
ECAM 11) that were conducted nation wide in 1996 and 2001. They
9
provided a clear picture of the status of poverty, inequality and living
conditions in Cameroonian households.
According to Deaton and Muellbauer (1980), we proceed by adopting a
measure of household size in terms of adult-equivalence, in which case, an
adult equivalence scale is used to weight each household member on the
basis of age and/or gender while an overall poverty line of 185.490 per day
per adult equivalent is use.
1.7 DEFINITION OF TERMS:
The key words of this research work are: poverty, inequality, inters-
temporal decomposition, Shapley value, living standard, adult equivalence
and Cameroon. We are going to define the principal terms that will
consequently help us in the analysis and comprehension of this work.
Poverty
As observed by PRSP (2003), in assessing the poverty status of a person or
groups of individuals is a complex undertaking. However, within any human
group, the poor are schematically, that portion of the population whose
living conditions are manifestly below the observed averaged. This allows us
to identify a kind of demarcation line between the “poor” and the “non-
poor”, one that varies in space and in time. In Cameroon, it is now possible
to identify the “poor” population using a variety of sources and a broad
range of characteristics that are often closely linked to the socio cultural
setting.
Inequality
In the context of our study and according to Cavendish (1999), inequality
measured is simply an index number characterising a relevant feature of a
10