4
1. Introduction
Productivity is very important to measure the capability of a country to remain
competitive against rivals. According to Solow's model, increase in the output per
employee can come from an increase of capital per employee or from an increase of
productivity (Blanchard, 2006a). Thus there are two sources of growth: capital
accumulation and productivity improvements (Blanchard, 2006a).
Productivity is the efficiency with which firms turn inputs into outputs (Syverson,
2010). In this thesis a particular kind of productivity is considered: total factor
productivity (TFP). TFP is a broad concept that takes into account not only capital and
labour input, but also intermediate input such as energy, materials and services (OECD,
2001).
From 1995 onward Italian productivity is slowly decreasing. Data considered in this
thesis are referred to the manufacturing sector, but the trend is similar also for the rest of
the economy. From the seventies until 1995 Italian TFP shows a smooth positive trend,
but from 1995 to 2007 it shows a negative trend. One accredited cause of Italian
decreasing productivity is the scarce intensity of ICT assets. According to Bugamelli
and Pagano (2004) the Italian technological lag with respect to the USA in 1997 was
approximately 7 years, even if some catching up was and is taking place.
Data seem to confirm that the current slowdown or recession is not just a cyclical
episode, but it is the continuation of the negative growth that began since the mid-
nineties (Daveri, 2008). With the passing of time, the nature of the Italian growth
process has changed: after 2000 GDP growth is driven only by the increase of the total
hours worked (Daveri, 2008). Productivity shows a declining dynamic also in the years
2006-2007, in contrast with the many illusions about the renewed ability to innovate of
Italian companies (Daveri, 2008).
Economists wonder long about why productivity differs from country to country and the
the possible causes are many: from firms' external operating environments to production
practices.
This thesis investigates the reasons why Italian TFP is decreasing. The possible causes
are listed and briefly explained. The theoretical hypothesis about the Italian situation go
from the most traditional (small dimension of Italian firms and specialization in low-
5
tech sectors) to the most revolutionary (the lack of complementarity between ICT assets
and organizational changes). The debate has not identified a single cause, but, according
to the statistical findings of this thesis, the lack of complementarity between ICT assets
and organizational changes seems to be a very convincing explanation. In any case also
the position of other economists have to be taken into account. According to Foresti,
Guelpa and Trenti (2007), Italy needs to grow the size of its firms more than to
restructure its sectors. The growth of firms size could also increase R&D expenditures
(Leoni, 2007). According to Ciccarone and Saltari (2010), greater capital accumulation
could be facilitated through tax incentives. A good educational system would allow very
productive human capital (Syverson, 2010). Many Italian negative externalities (such as
weak policy makers, heavy bureaucracy, inefficient justice and out-of-date
infrastructures) should be definitely tackled. Companies should invest more in
information and communication technologies (ICT) and they should reorganize their
production system in a modern and efficient way.
According to Ciccarone and Saltari (2010), there is a strong correlation between ICT
investments and productivity. Bugamelli and Pagano (2004) argue that two
preconditions must be fulfilled in a firm adopting ICT in order to get the expected extra
productivity: an increase in the share of skilled workers and a reorganization of
workplace. According to Trento and Warglien (2001), not only organizational changes
are essential when ICT investments occur, but they are also facilitated by ICT
investments. For Trento and Warglien (2001) ICT enable different production
organizational forms, and, on the other hand, they allow to coordinate, process and
diffuse a large amount of information at low costs (Trento & Warglien, 2001). Leoni
(2009) highlights that ICT implementation requires a codification and standardization of
organization processes. Activities that use ICT are knowledge-intensive and they need
relational, learning and problem solving high-skills (Leoni, 2009). For this reason
organizational forms such as lean production or communities of practice should be
implemented more in Italy (Leoni, 2007).
According to the findings of this thesis, Italian TFP is mainly affected by capital, ICT.
The negative coefficient of the product between a variable that captures high-quality
human capital and ICT suggests that in Italy has not yet happened the necessary
reorganization of work. Even if the share of high-quality human capital increases, it can
6
not increase productivity because the structure that can exploit high-quality capital
lacks. On the other hand, also ICT investments need organizational changes, so that it
would be possible to make the most of new technologies.
According to Galli (2010), it is necessary to be cautious with these findings because
data might be not reliable and Italian total factor productivity for the last ten years
seems to be underestimated. If data were not well-collected, the entire econometric
analysis would be affected. This thesis is written with the assumption that data are
reliable, even if because they are retrieved from the websites of prestigious
organizations such as OECD or EU-KLEMS.
Even if the worrying dynamic of Italian productivity seems to be evident, there is not
enough attention to this matter and to its causes. This brief thesis aims to stress the
statistical evidence of Italian decresing total factor ductivity, and it aims to find the most
important determinants of Italian TFP. The problem statement that guided this brief
research was: why is Italian productivity decreasing? And in particular which might be
the remedies? Does the capital affect productivity? What is the impact of ICT assets on
productivity? What about human capital? Does Italy need a reorganization of work in its
firms or not? What is the impact of R&D expenditures? But first of all some elementary
questions find their answer in this thesis: what is productivity? Why is it so important?
How is productivity evolving in Italy?
The rest of the thesis is organized as follows.
The second chapter gives some hints about the growth theory and it defines the concept
of productivity. In particular the concepts of single factor and multifactor productivity
are explained. Italian, Spanish, French and Germany productivity trends are compared
and graphs related to the different levels of ICT assets among three European countries
are briefly illustrated. Some economists' explanations of Italian decreasing productivity
and some possible political advices are shown. The second chapter conclude with a
research question: which are the relevant variables that affect Italian productivity?
The third chapter shows how the econometric analysis is built and which are its results.
In particular the theoretical basis is briefly explained. Then the the research
development is synthesized and the results of some econometric models are shown. This
chapter tackles results that both confirm and contradict the theory. Some possible
7
explanations of the findings of the most relevant statistical regression are discussed.
Some advices for future researches conclude the chapter.
9
2. Productivity
2.1 Introduction
About the cause of Italian economy stagnation there is remarkable consensus: the
insufficient growth of productivity can be considered the main reason of Italian
difficulties (Ciccarone & Saltari, 2010). The development of productivity is one of the
main determinants of the evolution of real national income per capita, that is considered
an important indicator of living standard (ISTAT, 2007). Despite this, productivity
seems not to be considered by Italian policy makers (Leoni, 2007).
In the second paragraph of this chapter it is explained the theoretical framework that
justifies a relation between real national income per capita and productivity. According
to Solow's model the aggregate production depends mainly by two factors: capital and
labour. As capital and labour can not increase further beyond a certain threshold, it
becomes important to exploit more the inputs that are given. This means to increase
productivity. Higher productivity means improved efficiency: better results with less
effort. At the aggregate level productivity can be considered as a measure of a country's
capability to remain competitive. But what is productivity?
In the third paragraph a definition of productivity is briefly given. In particular the
definition of productivity is linked to how it is measured. There are mainly two kinds of
measures: single factor productivity and multifactor productivity; the difference
between the two lies in the number of inputs considered. Another distinction is that
each productivity measure can be based on gross output or on value added.
In this chapter a particular kind of multifactor productivity is used: total factor
productivity. The choice lies in the significance of this variable and in the availability of
relevant databases on EU-KLEMS website. In the fourth paragraph there is a brief
description of KLEMS productivity and EU-KLEMS project. In the second part of this
paragraph some evidence about the worrying situation of productivity in Italy is given.
Data analysed are referred to the manufacturing sector and a comparison with the main
Italian competitors (France, Germany and Spain) is made.
The fifth paragraph proposes some possible explanations of the decreasing productivity
in Italy, that is the main topic of this chapter. Only some positions are explained without