II
According to many criticals, we can rank Harold Pinter
among the best dramatists of our time.
More or less influenced by the French Theatre of the
Absurd, he gave a great breath of renewal to the British
stage. The influence of Samuel Beckett on Pinter's choice
of characters, dramatic language and elusive themes, was
enormous.
By conventional standards, Beckett's plays are non-
plays or anti-plays because of the lack of a story or a plot.
His characters often are nameless and their dialogue is
almost non-existent. Beckett's main concern is to mirror
the metaphysical anguish of the human being, aware of
the absurdity of his own existence.
But, on the whole, Pinter's Absurdism differs from
Beckett's. In most of Pinter's plays we can notice a
meticulous mirroring of reality and a precise social
context. The author considers himself essentially a realist
and his plays have plot, narration and characterization. It
is precisely this realism, which is the first personal
characteristic of originality in Pinter's writing.
III
As a matter of fact, he refuses to give his audience all
the relevant information or answers about the realistic
situation presented on the stage. The author puts his
characters on the stage without revealing anything to us
about them and their former reality almost as if they were
people casually met on the road.
So, Pinter's theatre is a sort of disclosure of human
feelings, like man's loneliness, fear and incomprehension,
from a psychological point of view.
In order to attain his aim, the author makes use of a
particular dramatic setting and situation: a room endowed
with a door which symbolically separates the inside from
the outside world. Generally, the inside is warm and
pleasant, while the outside is dark and dreadful.
Two or more characters move in this well defined
space. Their love or familiar links are insubstantial and
their dialogues are often trivial. A sense of unresolved
anxiety, and at the same time the fear that someone could
penetrate the room through the door, terrorize the
characters and contribute to create an atmosphere of
menace.
IV
In spite of their apparent calm and balance, the
characters' actions are directed by their obsessions. For
this reason, the arrival of an intruder, generally coming
from the outside world, will help them to expose their
anguish.
Then, while the characters are concrete and realistic,
their behaviour is mysterious and the menace is obscure
and unspecified. As a consequence, ambiguity becomes an
original element in pinter's dramatic tecnique. Actually,
the element of Absurdity flows from Pinter's particular
way of presenting his characters: creatures hovering
between a physical dimension and a metaphysical one.
Apparently characters move within realistic situation
and their dramatic language is that of everyday
conversation. But, in Pinter's work, language has not
"informative" function. Sometimes, the characters'
speeches are only fragments that render the narration of
the story inconclusive.
Generally, Pinter's dramatic production is divided in
three periods, each of them characterized by a dominant
theme: first the room and the sense of menace; second
V
identity and the struggle for domination; third the
relationship between past and memory.
However this subdivision cannot be taken as rigid.
The three pairs of leading motifs are present in all Pinter's
production, both theatre and cinema, while undergoing a
process of variation.
This dissertation follows a thematic range that begins
with the description of Pinter's first play, The Room, up to
the last political ones. The aim of this choice is to show
the presence of a leitmotiv in Pinter's work and its gradual
evolution and variation in time.
This leitmotiv has two aspects: first, the symbolic
image of the room; second the presence of an intruder.
These two themes are also present in Pinter's screenplays
as a further confirmation of organic unity of the author's
work.
At the end of the Sixties, however, Pinter started
writing something quite different: here a new form and a
new thematic interest are mirrored in two plays whose
titles are Landscape and Silence.
VI
The present work focuses on the analysis of both these
plays that, among the remarkable set of Pinter's works
represent a new departure.
This dissertation is divided in four chapters structured in
the following way.
- CHAPTER ONE. It starts with an introductory
paragraph that, after speaking of the innovations of
modern theatre, introduces Harold Pinter, by emphasizing
his originality among the Absurdists.
The second paragraph deals with the evolution of a
unitary theme in all of Pinter's work, except for
Landscape and Silence.
The image of the room and the struggle for domination
against the intruder, are the central focus around which
Pinter has created his plays, from The Room (1957) to
The Basement (1966), passing through the screenplay of
The Servant (1962) written for Joseph Losey.
After the parenthesis of Landscape and Silence (1968),
Pinter came back to the usual scheme (intruder and
struggle for possession) in Old Times (1970), up to the
VII
last political plays, where the above mentioned themes
will be present with a further variation: totalitarianism.
The element of menace in Pinter's plays has different
faces and a substantial nature. Usually, the menace comes
from the outside, as we can see in some plays like The
Room or The Birthday Party. But in other plays, like The
Dumb Waiter, the intruder is already present, or can be
present in the psyche of the character, as happens to
Edward in A Slight Ache and to Len in The Dwarfs.
In The aretaker, just as in Tea Party and The
Homecoming, the intruder is received into the house, with
open arms, by the characters themselves. In these three
cases the result of this strategy is destructive of the
physical and psychological safety of the characters.
Sometimes the respective positions of the intruder, on
one hand, and the owner of the room, on the other, are
reversed. For example, this happens to the male characters
of Night School and The Basement, who are dispossessed
of their living space by the action of a stranger.
In three of the latest Pinter's plays, One For The Road,
Mountain Language and Party Time, notwithstanding the
VIII
new political tone, the author continues developing his
main purpose: the preoccupation about violence and
menace mirrored in a totalitarian society.
The third paragraph presents a short analysis of two
Pinter screenplays in order to underline the organic unity
of Pinter's work, from a linguistic and thematic point of
view.
The analysis of The Servant and The Accident confirms
the strict link between these works and the theatrical
ones.
-CHAPTER TWO. After writing a large number of
plays about the sense of looming menace, Pinter went on
to new thematic interests.
There were no longer all those doors that previously
symbolised a menace from the outside world, nor
intruders who destroyed the character's interior balance.
Now Pinter proposed a study about the importance of
memory and past reminiscences.
At the end of the Sixties, and after writing The
Homecoming, the author announced his desire for
something quite different, something with a lyrical and
IX
nostalgic turning. It was from this personal intention that
first Landscape and then Silence sprang up.
Chapter two deals with the analysis of Landscape
and is divided in three paragraphs.
The first explains the reason for Pinter's choice of a
new departure in his theatre. At this point it is very
important to say that, notwithstanding the thematic
innovation introduced in Landscape, the author had no
intention of abandoning his previous position above all
as regards dramatic structure. Once more, this choice
attests to organic unity and, at the same time, the
multiplicity of Pinter's work.
As a matter of fact, memory and past reminiscences
can be regarded as a new weapon used by the author in
order to continue his struggle against the absurdity and the
anguish of the human condition.
The second paragraph dwells upon the structure of the
theatrical work, analysing stage directions, scenario ( with
its symbolic meaning), characters and their relationship.
Ample treatment is given to this last structural aspect
because of its complexity. The relationship between the
X
two characters (Beth and her husband Duff), is based on
elements of strong contrasts ( above all with reference to
their different feelings), but also on elements of a
universal nature, like loneliness and love for animals.
The last paragraph confronts Landscape with Pinter's
screenplay for The Go-Between. Taken from the novel
written by L.P. Hartley, the screenplay develops the idea
of the elusiveness of the past and its relation with present.
Even if The Go-Between is closely linked to those
plays that deal with the themes of memory and past
events, it includes also other elements (the intruder)
characteristic of Pinter's theatrical works.
There is a close similarity between Leo, the main
character of The Go-Between, and Beth, the female
character of Landscape. They are linked together by the
same desire: to live on one's memories.
-CHAPTER THREE. Together with chapter two, it
represents the central core of this dissertation.
Chapter three deals with the analysis of Silence, a
one-act play staged in a double bill with its companion
XI
piece Landscape, and continues the investigation into that
thematic innovation begun in chapter two.
Among Pinter's plays Silence is the most difficult to
understand, because of its structural complexity which
consists of cross-cut monologues that are mostly
flashbacks to the past.
There are three characters: a girl in her twenties and
two men of different ages. They seem to live apart, each
in his own room, only that the room is not the traditional
one. The scenario of this one-act play is created by the
author through an original dramatic tecnique: three
separate areas on the stage and a chair in each one.
Like Landscape, Silence is a play based on memory,
past reminiscences, man's loneliness and the difficulty of
communication.
The first paragraph has the aim of pointing out
affinities and differences in both plays.
Landscape and Silence treat the same themes and present
a certain affinity as regards: charactisation, style and
dramatic structure.
XII
The differences concern, above all, the scenario and
dialogue.
The second paragraph is devoted to a simple analysis
of the work. It starts with an explanation of the
complexity of the dramatic structure, a complexity that is
more apparent than real. Then, it proceeds to the analysis
of various theatrical elements: scenario, stage directions,
the nature of the characters and their sentimental
relations.
-CHAPTER FOUR. It consists of a short conclusive
section dealing with the problem of the function of
language in Pinter's plays.
It starts with a couple of introductory pages about the
critical condition of language nowadays. During recent
years, scientific progress and psychoanalytical theories
have increased the problem of functional language. As a
consequence, the actual interest consists in finding a new
means of communication, capable of re-evaluating
words.
In this process, the contribution made by Pinter's
theatre is remarkable.
XIII
Chapter four proceeds with a paragraph that points out
the element of originality in Pinter's language. It is a sort
of completion of what was said at the beginning of
chapter one, and the circle connects back to the originality
of Pinter's figure among the dramatists of our time. It is
not by chance if Pinter's work has given rise to the term
Pinteresque, referring to Pinter's original way of writing
by using everyday conversation.
Everyday conversation, together with pauses, silences
and a considerable parsimony of words, are the great
qualities of Pinter's writing as analyzed in the last
chapter.
Thematically, this chapter puts an end to that process
of investigation into the sense of looming menace begun
at the beginning of this study .
According to the author, in the context of society,
language assumes a defensive or an offensive function in
order to protect the living space of a human being
threatened by the presence of a real or psychological
intruder.
XIV
By synthesis, language is an everyday weapon used
by man in his struggle against his fellow creatures and the
reality of the external world.