Introduction
For
many
years
now
numerous
international
sources
have
been
showing
the
rapidity
with
which
the
human
being
is
gradually
destroying
the
ozone
layer
contributing
with
his
activities
to
global
warming
and
to
an
increasing
rivers
water
and
ai r
pollution
rate
that
gives
no
sign
of
decreasing,
causing
the
extinction
of
many
species,
demolishing
forests,
depleting
mineral
resources,
inflicting
other
forms
of
damage
on
environment
and
consequently
on
his
own
life
(Sen,
2010,
pp.
576 -‐583);
all
this
happens
even
if
it
is
well-‐ known
by
now
that
man’s
future
mainly
depends
on
protection
and
safeguard
of
the
living
environment.
Many
actions
in
our
standard
behaviour
and
daily
routine
as
for
instance
turning
the
light
and
heating
on,
making
electrical
ap pliances
work,
driving
and
throwing
the
litter
away
surely
may
have
high -‐impact
environmental
consequences
(ENEA,
2006,
p.4).
The
present
academic
thesis
has
been
built
up
in
th e
theoretical
framework
that
has
just
been
outlined.
The
following
presented
w ork
consists
in
a
sort
of
exploratory
and
quantitative
pilot
study
aiming
at
investigating
the
knowledge,
perceptions
and
practices
of
a
sample
of
students
attending
the
last
two
years
of
secondary
school
from
different
educational
institutes
in
Rome
abou t
environmental
issues
,
without
any
claim
of
statistical
inference.
On
the
one
hand
it
is
the
same
individual
who
directs
himself
making
his
choices
thanks
to
his
values
(Sciolla,
2008,
pp.
89 -‐90)
and
on
the
other
hand
it
is
society
that
needs
to
have
new
generations
acquire
values,
norms,
attitudes
and
behaviours
that
are
generally
shared
by
some
social
group
(Catellani
in
Besozzi,
2006,
p.112).
Anyway
today
particularly
in
western
societies
you
can
often
hear
about
decline
in
morality
and
values
(Boudon,
2003,
p.7).
What
place
have
environmental
issues
in
the
value
scale
of
young
people
nowadays
considering
changes
in
the
public
moral
sense
and
belief
system
?
The
basic
hypothesis
of
this
analysis
lies
in
the
existence
of
a
relationship
between
knowledge
and
practices
related
to
environment
but
above
all
between
background
and
the
already
mentioned
practices.
The
usual
different
areas
of
socialization
and
values
transmission
which
are
crucial
in
this
age
group
have
been
considered
,
that
is
family,
school,
group
of
peers
and
mass
media.
In
what
refers
to
the
last
mentioned
institution
it
is
necessary
to
point
out
that
in
this
study
the
named
term
implies
essentially
television
because
if
compared
to
newspapers
and
the
radio
it
is
the
most
followed
by
the
examined
group
of
age;
whereas
the
internet
as
new
medium
is
still
difficult
to
be
used
by
youngsters
to
search
for
this
kind
of
information.
5
It
is
television
communication
that
has
been
regarded
as
the
most
appropriate
for
the
present
study
as
it
broadca sts
news
that
are
somehow
recognized
or
at
least
just
listened
to
by
individuals
of
any
age.
Within
educational
processes
it
is
yet
better
to
distinguish
between
formal
and
informal
level.
When
talking
about
formal
level
it
is
to
mean
project
and
intentionality
of
the
educational
process
as
they
are
to
be
observed
in
family
and
school
education.
The
informal
level
describes
instead
the
whole
of
social
relationships
which
produce
an
educational
and
socializing
effect
of
orientations
and
meanings
on
the
par t
of
the
subject
and
his
adjustment
to
norms
and
rules
defined
by
the
situation
or
by
the
social
milieu
in
which
his
experience
takes
place
(Besozzi,2006,
p.113).
The
survey
method
that
has
been
chosen
for
the
study
is
the
interview
with
a
self-‐completion
questionnaire.
The
questionnaire
is
based
on
29
questions
that
can
be
mainly
connected
to
three
areas:
-‐ the
first
area
is
cognitive
and
analyzes
bas ic
data;
-‐ the
second
area
regards
both
school
experience
and
extra -‐school
experience
that
is
interests
and
f ree
time;
-‐ the
third
area
examines
the
environmental
perception
in
young
people;
the
whole
of
knowledge,
perceptions
and
practices
they
adopt
with
regard
to
environmental
issues;
by
“environmental
issues”
are
going
to
be
meant
above
all:
water
consumption,
waste
sorting;
depletion
of
fossil
sources
of
energy;
nuclear
power
and
renewable
energy
(in
its
different
forms).
In
all
1.100
students
have
been
reached,
at
different
educational
institutes
in
Rome
and
attending
the
last
two
years
of
secondary
school;
questionnaires
have
been
delivered
to
and
filled
out
in
the
classrooms,
that
is
in
the
place
where
they
spend
the
most
of
their
time,
in
the
presence
of
the
undersigned,
available
for
any
question
or
explanation.
To
be
more
precise
the
schools
taken
into
c onsideration
are
nine:
a
secondary
school
focused
on
liberal
arts
(liceo
classico),
a
secondary
school
focused
on
scientific
subjects
(liceo
scientifico),
another
school
based
on
both
liberal
and
scientific
studies,
the
liberal
arts
courses
of
a
multi -‐choice
secondary
school,
a
secondary
school
focused
on
socio -‐psycho-‐pedagogical
subjects
and
one
focused
on
art,
two
technical
institutes
and
a
professional
institute.
The
survey
questionnaires
were
handed
out
between
May
and
June
therefore
in
the
period
of
time
going
from
the
blast
of
Fukushima
nuclear
power
plant
6
(11th
March
2011)
to
the
referendum
on
nuclear
power
(12 th
and
13th
June
2011).
Beyond
creating
difficulties
in
contacting
the
teachers
in
the
schools
this
has
carried
an
abundance
of
information,
both
coming
from
mass
media
and
any
socializing
agency ,
concerning
nuclear
power
above
all
but
also
the
energy
issue
in
a
wider
sense.
The
present
study
will
be
organized
in
five
chapters;
the
first
two
have
the
purpose
to
retrace
the
theoretical
framework
that
supported
the
investigation
and
more
specifically
the
questionnaire
construction.
The
first
chapter
will
take
into
account
the
environmental
risk
both
from
a
sociological
point
of
view
also
by
evaluating
related
argumentations,
like
the
relationship
between
science
and
mass -‐media
and
the
perception
of
risk;
and
in
addition
more
specifically
from
a
scientific
point
of
view
thanks
to
the
bibliographical
material
found
at
ENEA
during
the
attended
internship.
The
second
chapter
will
deal
with
the
decription
of
those
who
adopt
this
information
i.e.
young
people
and
it
will
do
this
examining
the
socialization
agencies
from
which
they
learn.
This
particular
group
of
age
was
chosen
on
the
whole
for
two
main
reasons:
on
the
one
hand
because
young
people
a re
the
future
of
our
society
and
therefore
it
is
important
to
know
what
they
think
and
how
they
act;
on
the
other
hand
they
were
chosen
to
observe
the
influence
of
the
different
socialization
agencies
that
is
family,
school,
group
of
peers
and
mass
media.
Starting
from
the
third
chapter
the
real
investigation
will
begin
to
be
explained
by
considering
the
research
project
and
the
survey
instrument;
in
the
fourth
chapter
the
reached
sample
will
be
described ,
whereas
the
fifth
chapter
will
report
the
most
rel evant
intersections
for
the
survey
purposes.
CHAPTER
1
The
environmental
issue:
a
theoretical
general
overview
1.1 Environmental
risk
Human
life
safety
has
always
been
considered
as
a
factor
depending
on
the
power
and
endurance
of
the
natural
world
in
which
we
are
living
and
in
the
course
of
history
the
human
being
has
always
shown
a
tendency
to
take
the
force
of
nature
and
the
safe
shelter
it
offers
for
granted.
Recently,
though,
nature
has
revealed
its
vulnerability
and
has
proved
to
be
more
and
more
inclined
to
abandon
us
in
a
state
of
desperate
inconsistency
and
this
is
especially
true
in
the
last
years
when
an
increasing
awareness
has
emerged
according
to
the
fact
that
the
environment
in
which
we
live
besides
7
being
extremely
fragile
also
represents
an
actual
threat
of
severe
insecurity
towards
human
life
and
that
of
other
species
(Sen,
2010,
pp.576 -‐583).
Demonstrations
of
the
rapidity
with
which
man
is
destroying
the
ozone
layer
are
increasing,
as
wel l
as
of
the
one
causing
global
warming,
polluting
rivers
and
air,
contributing
to
the
extinction
of
many
species,
demolishing
forests,
depleting
mineral
resources
and
inflicting
other
forms
of
devastation
or
adverse
effects
on
environment
and
consequently
on
living
organisms.
Despite
the
constant
succession
of
scientific
debates
dedicated
to
the
development
of
single
prognosis,
our
environmental
prospects
can
only
be
distinghished
by
a
general
sense
of
deep
vulnerability
(Sen,
2010,pp.
576 -‐
583).
Therefore
to
cope
with
the
climate
and
environment
necessities
of
a
sustainable
development
it
is
better
to
bear
in
mind
the
much
wider
and
more
strict
context
of
the
dependence
on
environment
that
characterizes
life
in
general,
but
above
all
that
especially
charact erizes
human
life
(Sen,
2010,pp.
576 -‐583).
Many
questions
arise
from
these
observations
(Sen,
2010,pp.
576 -‐583).
How
can
we
mitigate
our
vulnerability
?
How
do
we
have
to
deal
with
our
environmental
responsibilities
?
In
which
way
must
today’s
generation
understand
their
responsibilities
toward
future
citizens
?
Much
of
our
future
depends
on
protection
and
safeguard
of
the
environment
and
common
man
becomes
as
a
consequence
more
and
more
the
subject
of
environmental
policies
and
of
new
choices
where
environ ment
has
not
to
be
greedily
exploited
but
respectfully
managed.
Social
perception
with
regard
to
ecological
problems
gains
attention
and
the
effectiveness
of
any
action
or
policy
in
the
environmental
field
implies
both
a
different
awareness
on
the
part
of
citizens
and
the
adoption
of
suitable
behaviours
(Caracciolo
in
Beato,
Nobile,
Ciampi,
Fraire,
2009,
p.7).
The
“environmental
issue”
is
always
present
in
mass
media
communication,
in
public
policy
concerns,
and
in
the
interests
of
many
economic
subjects
b ut
yet
the
significance
that
is
given
to
the
concerning
news
and
themes
may
sometimes
have
the
effect
of
not
letting
man
feel
that
he
can
be
a
key
player
and
directly
correct
or
reduce
the
impacts
of
his
activities
on
environmental
quality
thanks
to
the
s imple
daily
choices
he
makes
(Maggi,
Simeone
in
Beato,
Nobile,
Ciampi,
Fraire,
2009,
p.9).
In
opinion
surveys
being
regularly
conducted,
the
environmental
issue
is
always
mentioned.
Even
if
it
is
not
always
on
top
of
the
main
concerns
of
Italians
and
Europ eans,
it
appears
anyway
in
the
list
of
problems
under
different
forms
as
for
instance:
pollution,
waste,
traffic,
climate
change,
etc.
(Struffi,
2000,
in
Pellizzoni,
Osti,
p.38).
From
opinion
surveys
it
emerges
that
naturality
is
a
highly
important
value
for
the
most
part
of
population
and
it
is
present
not
only
in
opinions
and
8